11
4.
the surrender of the enemy be reinstated to the
individuels and that since the Government in continuing
to occupy the land as an aerodrome, should allot pro per
building or agriculture land to the dispossessed owners
in Exchange for their former properties es compensation.
(b) That since buildings were demolished to form en aerodrome
for whose value the Government has since been continuing
to occupy as such, the compensation for the loss of the
buildings should be paid by the Government and should
not be treated es war damage and claimed as reparati ons
against Japan.
That on the 22nd August 1947 Your Fetitioner was given a
reply by the Colonial Secretary of the Government of Hong Kong
to the effect that legislation on the subject of compensation to
the owners of land was then being drafted; that the Government
has no intention to make any special provision for the payment
of compensation of the buildings demolished by the Japanese and
that such claim should form the subject of a reperation claim.
5. That on the 27th January 1948 there was published in the local
papers a report that the Attorney General would present to the
Legislative Council on the following day to be read a first time
e Bill intituted "Airfield (Kei Tak) Extension and Reversion
Ordinance 1947 and the t provisions would be made to revert the
privately owned lands to the Crown and to compensate the owners
with payments according to the graded values of from $1.50 to $5.00
per square foot for buildings lots and 15 cents for agricultural
lots.
That the news of this proposed legislation which does not
provide for the payment of compensation for the buildings
6.
demolished and only gives a small and insignificant price for the
reversion of the lend, was received by the public with deep regret
and dis-appointment for the following reasons:-
- 2.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.